Skip to main content

Numerical Integral Calculator – Estimate ∫

Quick answer

This calculator computes definite integrals: ∫₀¹x²dx = 1/3 exact via antiderivative x³/3; numeric checks with trapezoid and Simpson side by side.

  • Errors reported.

Figures are estimates from this calculator’s standard formula — adjust the inputs in the tool below for your exact number.

How the Numerical Integral Estimator Works

∫ₐᵇ f(x)dx ≈ F(b) − F(a) | trapezoid: (h/2)Σ weighted heights | Simpson: (h/3)[1,4,2,…,1]

The estimator attacks definite integrals two ways. Symbolically, antiderivatives close the problem exactly: ∫₀¹ x² dx = [x³/3]₀¹ = 1/3, and ∫₀^π sin x dx = [−cos]₀^π = 2. Numerically, when no antiderivative exists (or one is unknown), the trapezoid rule and Simpson’s rule approximate from sampled values with errors printed for each: on ∫₀¹ x⁴ dx with n = 4 the trapezoid rule returns 0.2207 versus the true 0.2 (10.3% high), while Simpson at the same nodes gives 0.20052 — 0.26% high, with its h⁴ error shrinking 16× per refinement. The calculator shows node tables, weights, both estimates, and the exact value when its library recognizes the integrand — so students see convergence, not just answers. Absolute and relative errors quantify which rule to trust at each n.

  1. 1

    Enter f(x) and bounds

    The integrand over [a, b]

  2. 2

    Try the antiderivative

    Known forms return exact values like 1/3

  3. 3

    Run the numeric rules

    Trapezoid and Simpson estimates with node tables

  4. 4

    Compare errors

    Absolute and relative errors rank the methods

Use Cases

Calculus Checking

Confirm ∫₀¹x² = 1/3 both symbolically and numerically

Non-Elementary Integrals

e^(−x²) areas via Simpson when no antiderivative exists

Lab Data

Integrate sampled measurements with error bounds

Tips

  • 1

    Antiderivative F gives exact F(b) − F(a)

  • 2

    Simpson beats trapezoid by two error orders on smooth f

  • 3

    Error shrinks 4× (trapezoid) or 16× (Simpson) per doubling of n

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting to evaluate F at both bounds and subtract

  • Dropping the constant of integration in definite settings (it cancels anyway)

  • Using Simpson with odd n

  • Believing numeric rules handle discontinuities gracefully

FAQs

What is ∫₀¹ x² dx?

1/3 exactly — antiderivative x³/3 evaluated from 0 to 1.

What is ∫₀^π sin x dx?

2: [−cos x]₀^π = −(−1) − (−1) = 2.

How close is trapezoid on ∫₀¹ x⁴ with n=4?

0.2207 vs 0.2 — about 10% high; Simpson on the same nodes gives 0.20052.

When must I go numeric?

For e^(−x²), sin(x)/x and other integrands with no elementary antiderivative.

Which rule is more accurate?

Simpson on smooth functions — its error scales as h⁴ versus trapezoid’s h².